Acts Chapter 15: The Jerusalem Council and Gentile Inclusion


Summary
Acts 15 narrates a pivotal moment in the early church, resolving the debate over whether Gentile believers must follow Jewish law, and reinforcing the gospel’s spread. The chapter unfolds in several key scenes:
  • The Dispute in Antioch (15:1–5): Some Judean believers teach that Gentile converts in Antioch must be circumcised to be saved, causing conflict. Paul and Barnabas oppose this, and the church sends them, with others, to consult apostles and elders in Jerusalem. In Jerusalem, some believing Pharisees argue for circumcision and Mosaic law observance.
  • The Jerusalem Council (15:6–21): Apostles and elders meet to discuss. Peter recounts God’s acceptance of Gentiles through faith, citing Cornelius’ conversion. Paul and Barnabas share their Gentile mission’s success. James, citing Amos 9:11–12, proposes not burdening Gentiles, suggesting four abstentions (from idolatry, sexual immorality, strangled animals, and blood) to foster unity. The council agrees.
  • The Council’s Letter (15:22–29): The church sends a letter with Judas and Silas, affirming the decision: Gentiles are saved by faith, not law, but are urged to follow the four abstentions for harmony with Jewish believers. The letter is sent to Antioch and beyond.
  • Reception and Continued Mission (15:30–35): In Antioch, the letter brings joy and encouragement. Judas and Silas exhort the church, then return to Jerusalem. Paul and Barnabas remain, teaching.
  • Paul and Barnabas Separate (15:36–41): Paul proposes revisiting churches, but disagrees with Barnabas over taking John Mark, who previously left them. They part ways: Barnabas and Mark sail to Cyprus, while Paul and Silas travel through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening churches.
Cross-References
  • Dispute Over Circumcision:
    • Galatians 2:1–10: Paul’s account of the council.
    • Acts 10:44–48: Cornelius’ conversion.
    • Genesis 17:10–14: Circumcision covenant.
  • Peter’s Testimony:
    • Acts 11:1–18: Peter defends Gentile inclusion.
    • Romans 3:28: Justification by faith.
    • Ephesians 2:8–9: Salvation by grace.
  • James’ Proposal:
    • Amos 9:11–12: Gentiles called by God’s name.
    • Leviticus 17:10–14: Laws on blood and strangled animals.
    • 1 Corinthians 8:1–13: Avoiding offense in food issues.
  • Council’s Letter:
    • Acts 16:4: Delivering the decrees.
    • Romans 14:1–4: Unity despite differences.
    • Hebrews 13:17: Obeying church leaders.
  • Paul and Barnabas’ Split:
    • Acts 13:13: John Mark’s departure.
    • Colossians 4:10: Later reconciliation with Mark.
    • Philippians 1:18: Gospel advanced despite conflicts.
  • General Theme:
    • Acts 1:8: Gospel to all nations.
    • Galatians 3:28: Unity in Christ.
Theological Meaning
Acts 15 is rich with theological themes that shape the early church and mission:
  • Salvation by Faith: The council affirms that Gentiles are saved by grace through faith, not by keeping the Law (15:11), clarifying the gospel’s essence (Romans 3:20; Ephesians 2:8).
  • Unity in Diversity: The four abstentions (15:20) promote harmony between Jewish and Gentile believers, balancing freedom with sensitivity (Romans 14:19; 1 Corinthians 10:32).
  • Scriptural Authority: James’ use of Amos (15:16–18) grounds the decision in Scripture, showing God’s plan for Gentiles (Isaiah 49:6; Acts 13:47).
  • Spirit’s Guidance: The council’s consensus, led by the Spirit (15:28), reflects divine direction in church decisions (John 16:13; Acts 13:2).
  • Church Leadership: Apostles, elders, and the church’s collective discernment (15:6, 22) model godly governance, ensuring doctrinal clarity (Hebrews 13:7; 1 Timothy 3:1).
  • Mission’s Resilience: Despite the dispute (15:1–2) and Paul-Barnabas split (15:39), the gospel advances, showing God’s purpose prevails (Philippians 1:12; Acts 1:8).
  • Human Frailty: The disagreement over Mark (15:38) reveals human imperfection, yet God uses both Paul and Barnabas’ teams for His glory (2 Corinthians 4:7).
Questions and Answers
  1. Why did some insist Gentiles be circumcised (15:1, 5)?
    • Judean believers and Pharisees thought circumcision, a covenant sign (Genesis 17:10), was necessary for salvation, misunderstanding grace (15:1; Galatians 5:2–4). They valued Mosaic tradition (15:5).
  2. What was Peter’s argument at the council (15:7–11)?
    • Peter cited Cornelius’ conversion, where God gave Gentiles the Spirit by faith, not law (15:8–9; Acts 10:44). He argued all are saved by grace, avoiding a “yoke” of law (15:10–11; Romans 3:24).
  3. Why did James quote Amos 9:11–12 (15:16–18)?
    • James showed Scripture predicted Gentile inclusion in God’s restored kingdom (15:16–17; Amos 9:11). It affirmed God’s plan, supporting Peter’s testimony (15:14; Isaiah 42:6).
  4. What were the four abstentions, and why were they chosen (15:20)?
    • Gentiles were to abstain from idolatry, sexual immorality, strangled animals, and blood (15:20; Leviticus 17:10–16). These addressed practices offensive to Jews, fostering unity (1 Corinthians 8:7–13).
  5. Why was the council’s letter significant (15:23–29)?
    • The letter clarified salvation by faith, eased Gentile burdens, and promoted peace (15:24–28). Sent with Judas and Silas, it carried apostolic authority (15:27; Acts 16:4).
  6. How did the Antioch church react to the letter (15:30–31)?
    • The believers rejoiced, relieved of legalism, and were encouraged by Judas and Silas’ exhortations (15:31–32). It strengthened their faith and mission (15:32; Romans 15:13).
  7. Why did Paul and Barnabas disagree over John Mark (15:37–39)?
    • Paul distrusted Mark for abandoning them earlier (15:38; Acts 13:13). Barnabas, known for encouragement (Acts 4:36), wanted to give Mark another chance, leading to their split (15:39).
  8. How did the split affect the mission (15:40–41)?
    • God used the disagreement to multiply efforts: Barnabas and Mark went to Cyprus, Paul and Silas to Syria and Cilicia (15:41; Philippians 1:18). Both strengthened churches (15:41; Colossians 4:10).
Additional Notes for Readers
  • Historical Context: The council (circa AD 49–50) addressed tensions post-Gentile conversions (15:1; Galatians 2:1). Jerusalem was the church’s center, with apostles and elders leading (15:2; Acts 11:30). Antioch was a Gentile mission hub (Acts 13:1). The decrees (15:20) aligned with Noahic laws (Genesis 9:4), relevant to Jews and Gentiles. Gallio’s later rule (Acts 18:12) helps date this. John Mark’s departure (15:38) occurred in Pamphylia (Acts 13:13).
  • Cultural Questions: Readers might wonder why circumcision was contentious (15:1). It symbolized covenant identity, but Paul saw it as nullifying grace for Gentiles (Galatians 5:6). The “yoke” (15:10) referred to the Law’s burden (Matthew 11:30). James’ leadership (15:13) reflected his prominence among Jewish believers (Galatians 1:19). The letter’s delivery (15:27) ensured authenticity in oral cultures. The split (15:39) was emotional but not doctrinal.
  • Application: Acts 15 calls believers to trust salvation by grace, seek unity through compromise, and rely on Scripture and the Spirit in decisions. It encourages resilience in mission despite conflicts, advancing God’s kingdom (Ephesians 4:3).
Back to blog